Clara Clemens
To some degree, it was
left to one person to put the icing on the Mark Twain cake... or to
destroy it. Clara Clemens was the only child to marry and live to
middle age, and the only one to give Mark Twain a grandchild. In 1931
she published her warm and delightful tale of being Mark Twain's
daughter, entitled My Father MARK TWAIN, where she shared the
enviable childhood she enjoyed. Clara reassured Twain's fans that he
was the wonderful man they imagined. The book has been panned by some
as the predictable, worshipful gloss of a biased beneficiary. Still,
it is well written, and fairly self-deprecating, and I trust it from
a gut feeling that she has given a straight-forward, albeit
affectionate account. Clara certainly could have have chosen to do
otherwise. Children of men like Twain do not always respond with
undying adoration.
Olivia Clemens sits before her daughter and future son-in-law.
Clara Clemens found the
love of her life during her music studies in Europe. She became a
decent musician, but married an even better one, a world class
pianist with a $4.00 name. Clara married Ossip Gabrilowitch with Sam
Clemens's blessing, and began a life of world travels and celebrity
with him. When she published her book she was somewhat famous in her
own right. It did her no harm to remind her fans that she was the
daughter of one of the most famous men in the world. But I think she
wanted to reassure her father's fans that he was for real, and that
his legacy should be lasting. Allowing us to see inside the Clemens
household was a peek into the idyllic American family. I think Clara
wanted Americans to know that despite any of our own troubles,
including her own, the myth of the nuclear American “fambly” (as
Twain liked to spell it) had some basis in fact. Still, something
went awry.
I survey this scene as a
“born-again” Christian, and consequently I have read a great deal
into the conditions and outside pressures on the events in these
people's lives, and perhaps even more into the spaces between. Samuel
Clemens was a professional skeptic, an agnostic, and because of his
powerful influence, his wife was a frustrated, somewhat modernized Quaker. The Clemens
home was always being entertained by the most “enlightened”
people on earth, where doctrines of religion were bantered about like
popular riddles. At any given time, you might find some of Clemens's
closest friends, Christian ministers, socializing and reasoning with
him or his house guests. You might hear groups singing negro
spirituals, favorites of Clemens from his childhood, or some famous
ribald humorist bringing down the house at a pool or poker game.
But
thanks to his wife Olivia, Christianity was a cultural foundation
which gave the Clemens home a moral compass and firm stability. And
Sam Clemens loved the Christmas story as an irresistible tradition...
a symbol of American graciousness, but he had trouble whenever he
thought about it very deeply. Both of them believed in a Supreme
Being, but presented a confused spiritual front to their children.
Suzie, the oldest and the
acknowledged “genius” and deep thinker, and the most talented
artist of the three children, searched for spiritual truth until her
youthful investigations at college led her to Mary Baker Eddy and
Christian Science. This seemed to be the perfect fit for her diverse
family religious associations. The girls were raised to honor the
code of “noblesse oblige,” always undertaking worthy causes, such
as joining the Society for the Protection of Animals. They learned
early from their father, a chronic and proud rule-breaker, to trust
their own sense of right and wrong. One of the most irresistible
temptations for right-brained folk, who do so much creating and
problem solving, is to address the here and the now, on their own,
eventually fashioning their own golden calf, and often creating their own god- and in their own image.
But sometimes Sam Clemens, and
us for that matter, forget that Mark Twain never existed. He was a
creation. His stories and his wisdom were also creations, only given
significance by book sales. The man who did not dare put his own name
on his earliest writings out of self-preservation, ended up the
shadow of the legendary personality he had conjured up. Mark Twain
could be as sure as Moses about himself, and his choice of words.
Sam Clemens not so much. But at some point Moses and Mark Twain were
arch-rivals... as designers of the American Psyche. But there were some big differences between them. One
was real, and had a three thousand year head start.
Moses was Moses. He had no
pseudonym to hide behind. He had orders directly from the Creator of
the Universe. Still, it was Mark Twain, a mere alias, who inspired and justified our slow cultural
shift away from the Judeo- Christian God. Mark Twain told of an
unforgiving world, where dog ate dog, a veritable indictment of the
human race where a few giants of humanity stood above the rest, as he
cast doubts about God's direct involvement in our lives, and the
veracity of the Bible, especially the Gospels which tell of the life
and miracles of Christ.
Later when his wife was stricken with serious heart disease, and forbidden to even see him, it became obvious what a heartbreak it had been to live under his shadow, and try to lovingly, patiently reason with such an irresistible force. He begged that if she lived, he would never more question her faith. But the damage was done.
Later when his wife was stricken with serious heart disease, and forbidden to even see him, it became obvious what a heartbreak it had been to live under his shadow, and try to lovingly, patiently reason with such an irresistible force. He begged that if she lived, he would never more question her faith. But the damage was done.
True Clemens “prayed,”
and thanked “God” for his wife and the other beauties of nature,
but he doubted anyone really knew the complexities or details about a
personal, Creator God, IF he existed.
Then when his daughter died unexpectedly, he immediately fell back into the psychological comforts of her ascending to a better place, a painless place where he wanted to be himself... a place he would never want to deny her of. Mark Twain may have been an agnostic, but Samuel Clemens was a closet Christian, who believed fervently in the afterlife, (who but God could establish such a place?) and greatly enjoyed playing the devils advocate. It had always been a great attention getter. Still, agnosticism offers no comfort or closure when eternal things matter.
Samuel Clemens was a product of the pervasive disillusionment that settled in America as the adrenaline subsided and Americans did the horrifying math after the Civil War. Rather than accept their own role in this great collective travesty, they blamed God, or mostly just abandoned Him. In their post-war concept of God, a good and loving God could not have, would not have let such a horrible thing happen. Amazingly, these same folks were sure before the war that "God was on their side."
Later as “Mark Twain” studied French history in order to write Recollections of Joan of Arc, he had to have realized that the perplexities and injustices of Man have been legion, for Millennia, and for him, further ruled out the possibilities of an active God in our human scenario. The more recent, tragic Napoleonic Wars, and then the Franco-Prussian War only added fresh stones to the burial pyramid over the tomb of Christian Faith. All this greed and violence seemed to prove that God was asleep or dead. Nobody seemed to want to blame man for man's godlessness.
Still, Twain's book about St. Joan was as sweet and pious as if he were writing about his own daughter. Mark Twain always projected skepticism, about leaders, government, organized religion, the human race... it was the lifelong theme of his writing personna. But underneath he wanted to believe in Joan... For him, she may have been the last evidence of a Godly person, and even he did not want to destroy her legacy. Like many of us, Samuel Clemens rode the fence, afraid to commit to a doctrine of God, but more afraid to completely abandon it.
Then when his daughter died unexpectedly, he immediately fell back into the psychological comforts of her ascending to a better place, a painless place where he wanted to be himself... a place he would never want to deny her of. Mark Twain may have been an agnostic, but Samuel Clemens was a closet Christian, who believed fervently in the afterlife, (who but God could establish such a place?) and greatly enjoyed playing the devils advocate. It had always been a great attention getter. Still, agnosticism offers no comfort or closure when eternal things matter.
Samuel Clemens was a product of the pervasive disillusionment that settled in America as the adrenaline subsided and Americans did the horrifying math after the Civil War. Rather than accept their own role in this great collective travesty, they blamed God, or mostly just abandoned Him. In their post-war concept of God, a good and loving God could not have, would not have let such a horrible thing happen. Amazingly, these same folks were sure before the war that "God was on their side."
Later as “Mark Twain” studied French history in order to write Recollections of Joan of Arc, he had to have realized that the perplexities and injustices of Man have been legion, for Millennia, and for him, further ruled out the possibilities of an active God in our human scenario. The more recent, tragic Napoleonic Wars, and then the Franco-Prussian War only added fresh stones to the burial pyramid over the tomb of Christian Faith. All this greed and violence seemed to prove that God was asleep or dead. Nobody seemed to want to blame man for man's godlessness.
Still, Twain's book about St. Joan was as sweet and pious as if he were writing about his own daughter. Mark Twain always projected skepticism, about leaders, government, organized religion, the human race... it was the lifelong theme of his writing personna. But underneath he wanted to believe in Joan... For him, she may have been the last evidence of a Godly person, and even he did not want to destroy her legacy. Like many of us, Samuel Clemens rode the fence, afraid to commit to a doctrine of God, but more afraid to completely abandon it.
So, for Twain and the
Twainists, the Jesus of the New Testament was out of the question.
Christian Science seemed more reasonable to some, as it absorbed the
tenants of Christianity without its seemingly absurd contradictions
to modern science, which was assumed at the time to be on the cusp of
unraveling all the mysteries of creation. (THAT never happened ) But strangely, Mark Twain
would have none of it. After his daughter Suzie, a new convert died
in her youth, he applied his healthy Mid-western skepticism to Eddy's
assumptions, burying Christian Science with Christianity. Thou shalt
have no other god but me.
Yes, I believe that Mark
Twain had become Sam Clemens's god. After all, everyone worshiped
him... all over the world.
It is taught in Christian
legend that Satan, the so-called devil, was once a high angel in
Heaven called Lucifer, in fact the highest angel next to God.
Everything was harmonious up there until he decided to lead a rebellion of angels
against the Creator and usurp His authority. Lucifer's pride led to
arrogance and his arrogance led to narcissism and it all led to
self-worship and the delusion of his omnipotence. It also led to the
spiritual warfare which has divided the Universe ever since. We
are on this earth to settle the question...
We humans will settle the great question, and prove God's love. And we prove it by living, and making the choice for immortality... or not. A loving God did not create us to be happy on this earth, but to prepare us for the life to come... if we will have it. And some of us require more preparation than others. They are the heathens, the athiests, the agnostics... the hold outs. Christians are merely the ones who know they are toast and recognize what a great deal God offers through Christ. And an offer I might add, which the angels in the legend never got. God just put them in Heaven and then judged them when they were bad. No warnings, no trials, no Sunday School, no Joel Osteen.
AND IRONICALLY, or more probably PROVIDENTIALLY, the legend suggests that some important issues were raised when God, doing his role as Master Justice of the Peace, cast Lucifer and his allies down out of heaven... below... to Hell, wherever that is. Christians today mostly agree that “hell” is the absence of God. C. S. Lewis proposed that since God was not bound by the rules of physics as we understand them, all of the inhabitants of hell might be shrunk down to the size of a sewing thimble.
AND IRONICALLY, or more probably PROVIDENTIALLY, the legend suggests that some important issues were raised when God, doing his role as Master Justice of the Peace, cast Lucifer and his allies down out of heaven... below... to Hell, wherever that is. Christians today mostly agree that “hell” is the absence of God. C. S. Lewis proposed that since God was not bound by the rules of physics as we understand them, all of the inhabitants of hell might be shrunk down to the size of a sewing thimble.
It has been suggested that
Lucifer was the first to make the accusation, that a good and loving
God would not deliberately put his beautiful creations, in this case
himself and his angels, in a fiery pit, forever. Surely an
all-powerful God, a God of Love, would never make such a judgment.
This was the seeming injustice. After all, God is so much more
intelligent and powerful than we are. We, as Christianity constantly
reminds us, are weak, flesh and bone mortals. A real God of LOVE and
mercy would never...
Otherwise, according to Mark Twain, and some members of my own family, the God of the
Bible was unloving, unjust, unmerciful... and downright UNFAIR! These were the
bitter conclusions of many Americans and Europeans in Twain's time.
So in the Beginning...
before the beginning of the Earth, this question of a loving God was
in the forefront. It is nothing new that you have thought of, or that troubles those who are in God's camp. Christian writer-evangelists like Hal Lindsay have
spent many volumes trying to address this “Age-old” question.
How could a loving God allow such bad things to happen to innocents?
It's funny, had not God given us Free Will, and an earth to test our spirits, we would have been about as complex as the toad chirping outside of my bedroom window. You would not be the independent, free thinking, creative you. But since he did, and did not force himself on you, many call him heartless, cruel and unworthy. So he must be untrue. Because we do not like how he set up our human trials.
Job, perhaps the oldest book in the Old Testament, had a lot to add to that... if you are having trouble with this question... Jews and Christians have been kicking around this question since God allowed Joseph to be sold into slavery by his own brothers, only to be thrown into an Egyptian prison for years, for a crime he did not commit. You need to read that story as well... how God used the tragedies which beset Joseph to show how he works out the demons in our spirit... and always redirects evil to turn out good, and bless His people.
It requires a lot of trust to accept this... But those that do get to share eternity with the Mastermind of this whole soul-shaping, immortality scheme. Those who do not have to come up with the impossible to offset this paradigm, including explaining away Creation, faith, answered prayers, and reforming two thousand years of Judeo-Christian values. To do this they must be intolerant, and declare war on the Judeo-Christian paradigm.That is where our country is today.
It's funny, had not God given us Free Will, and an earth to test our spirits, we would have been about as complex as the toad chirping outside of my bedroom window. You would not be the independent, free thinking, creative you. But since he did, and did not force himself on you, many call him heartless, cruel and unworthy. So he must be untrue. Because we do not like how he set up our human trials.
Job, perhaps the oldest book in the Old Testament, had a lot to add to that... if you are having trouble with this question... Jews and Christians have been kicking around this question since God allowed Joseph to be sold into slavery by his own brothers, only to be thrown into an Egyptian prison for years, for a crime he did not commit. You need to read that story as well... how God used the tragedies which beset Joseph to show how he works out the demons in our spirit... and always redirects evil to turn out good, and bless His people.
It requires a lot of trust to accept this... But those that do get to share eternity with the Mastermind of this whole soul-shaping, immortality scheme. Those who do not have to come up with the impossible to offset this paradigm, including explaining away Creation, faith, answered prayers, and reforming two thousand years of Judeo-Christian values. To do this they must be intolerant, and declare war on the Judeo-Christian paradigm.That is where our country is today.
It is the underlying
ambition of most non-believers to disprove God; to create a more fair
paradigm than the one described in the Bible. Surely modern man, with
his superior science, can do better than “all are sinners and
sinners go to hell.” Surely we can create our own sense of justice,
of right and wrong, of appropriate actions and consequences. But try
as we may, the more man struggles with justice the farther away it
seems to be.
There can never be enough
laws, never enough lawyers, never enough prisons, (or few enough!)
never peace on earth. There is always a Napoleon or a Hitler or a
terrorist who is determined to superimpose his own paradigm over
ours. Mark Twain was right in that regard, THERE IS NO HOPE FOR THE HUMAN RACE! Man has tried valiantly to make a better world, and has made
incredible strides in agriculture, medicine and technology, but has
also succeeded in more efficient forms of genocide and injustice,
negating the progress. And that is why Christians still believe that
man is basically a sinner and in need of a savior. And God has provided one.
Whether it is actually
true, the story of Lucifer has survived to warn us of the dangers of
self-love, which led to rebellion against God and ultimately
isolation from Him. Self- love does not have to be a bad thing...
Jesus taught that we must love others as WE LOVE OURSELVES. Self-love
is assumed as long as it is not self-importance or self-worship.
Jesus assumed that we would all have the kind of self-love that we
might better describe as self-respect... a healthy self-image based
on our right relationship with God. We are not to hate or loathe
ourselves. That would lead to self-abuse and even self-destruction.
That would not do God or us any good. The self- flagellating religions have inspired the most stagnant and non-creative societies on the planet. That is what makes the Cross so unique and wonderful. HE did it for us. How fair is that?
Christians can love
themselves because they believe that when God looks upon their
hearts, he does not see their sinfulness but the Christ who covers it, who was
punished for it. And God loves His Son, that “Lamb of God” who
took away our sins. He sees Christ in us and is thus reconciled with us,
and we look inside and see Christ as well, and are reconciled to God.
But if it is so simple, why did Lucifer or Mark Twain stumble at
this?
That is the question. Why?
Why buck the free gift of God's grace and forgiveness? Why take
chances with eternal consequences? It is a choice that each of us has
to make. There must be a million reasons why anyone would reject the
saving power of the cross, and to choose instead to try to find God
some other way. Most of them are born in arrogance and self-sufficiency. A study of the ministry of Jesus has important clues.
Jesus had little trouble
convincing the poor, or the sick or the uneducated. His biggest beef
was with the rich and powerful, the most educated. Rich people want
to believe that they are special, blessed for some special purpose,
if only to have a great life, and are above others, and especially
above God's laws. Jesus had a very poor prediction for most rich
people, whose wealth, and what they did with it, will someday be
their condemnation.
This Biblical truth has
led to near persecution of the rich in this country today. Americans
believe that it is perfectly fair to tax individuals with outrageous
and discriminatory tariffs simply because they are wealthy. They are
probably going to hell anyway, even according to Jesus. This
adversarial relationship which rich people are often born into does
little to soften their attitudes. The state and the church are set
on demonizing and milking them. The unions are set to obstruct them.
Their employees are set to get even with them, often by cheating with
their time-cards or outright stealing. Johnny Cash sang a famous song
making a hero out of a car part thief in Detroit. Commercials make
light of the common American sentiment to “stick it to the man.”
"But Sir, YOU are the man!"
"But Sir, YOU are the man!"
So it might be
understandable if wealthy publishers, politicians, entertainers, etc.
don't give a hoot about Jesus. But Jesus's bigger public relations
impasse was with the educated men who dominated religion and the
courts. They willfully ignored any scriptures which might have
vindicated him, while willfully breaking their own cherished laws to
wipe him out. They truly hated him, and had no tolerance for the
threat he represented to their turf. They constantly set intellectual
traps for him, playing games with words and riddles out of doctrines.
This has always been the idle pastime of the elites of society.
The Pharisees assumed, “Surely, if there was a “son of God” he would be educated in the prestigious religious centers” like them. But God also has a sense of irony, if not humor. They trusted in their own wisdom, rooted in self-preservation and cultural narcissism, and killed Jesus out of ignorance, jealousy and fear. Educated folk today react to Jesus much the same and for the same reasons.
The Pharisees assumed, “Surely, if there was a “son of God” he would be educated in the prestigious religious centers” like them. But God also has a sense of irony, if not humor. They trusted in their own wisdom, rooted in self-preservation and cultural narcissism, and killed Jesus out of ignorance, jealousy and fear. Educated folk today react to Jesus much the same and for the same reasons.
The rich and the highest
educated are a minority who control our society, and are as
protective of their fragile domains as ever. They have seen the mob
violence of the French Revolution and in Ferguson, Missouri, and know
that they can never afford to let the masses become a powerful force.
They must maintain their control by any means. The best means is by
brainwashing. The Internet is their latest and most effective tool.
But there is no room for
this kind of oligarchy in Christianity, and therefore they will
forever be at odds with it. Universities will always propose any
other theory of the origins of the Universe, no matter how
improvable, than the fact of a God-created solar system. The wealthy
will always create their own value systems and their own ethics to
accommodate their lifestyles. That is why the rich young ruler walked
away from Jesus, sadly. He had asked what must he do... and Jesus
told him the one thing he did not want to hear... to sell all of his
possessions and follow Him. Without complete submission to Christ, that was impossible.
When the rich and powerful
run into this uncompromising wall of Jesus, they understandably
decide to create their own religion. Or they just indulge themselves
in self-worship. And when you are smart and handsome and wealthy, you
might even believe you are worthy...
It is sad but true, as
Jesus explained, that blessed are the poor, and the meek, perhaps
because they have nothing to lose, by letting God control their
lives. And they have everything to gain.
The Lucifers and Mark
Twains of the world live under the delusion that they are special,
even anointed, and have some special access to God, or at least their
concept of Him. All through the Bible, characters old and young,
great and small, yielded to the temptation to assume they have
advanced beyond simple mortal existence. The most obvious was
Solomon, who went from the throne of Israel to the most
disillusioned, gluttonous infamy in short order. He is famous for
announcing “all is vanity.”
Solomon decided that Life
was meaningless, because he had built his life on meaningless values
like sex and escapism. Self indulgence. Had he a servant's heart like
his father's, he might have, would have had a totally different
legacy. How quickly the rich and powerful judge the world and
themselves according to their own measuring stick. That is why new
religions can't replace the Golden Oldie. “Do unto others as you
would have them do unto you... (Jesus) ” If you were hungry, or
cold, or helpless, would you not want someone's mercy? Then be
merciful. Be generous to those less fortunate. Share your wealth.
Liquidate if you must to keep it from owning your soul. Misused
wealth always leads to rationalization and insolence. In other words,
far from God. That is right next to the absence of God.
BUT if we can find an
intellectual trick to spin on, preferably an excuse provided by
scholars, we can reject the whole Christian paradigm and make up our
own... one more convenient to our times, our lifestyle, our needs,
our preferences...
Just as the hand-picked
“prophets of old” like Moses or David or Solomon failed their
mission and found infamy instead of victory, the rich and powerful
still do, and kick against the goads, as one very educated man did
while persecuting Christians. God had to strike self-righteous Saul
the pharisee down on the road, and stop him in his tracks, even blind
him temporarily to get his attention. With some redirection, he
became Paul who wrote much of the New Testament. But God cannot do
that every time. Each of us has the free moral agency to choose God
or reject Him; Run from God or seek Him. Know God or make up one we
like better. But we are not wise, no matter how much we may wish
differently. We often choose what is appealing rather than what is
true and eternal.
Clara Clemens was
understandably confused about religion, but her mother, once an avid
host for the underground railroad, had planted strong values of
service and altruism.
Once while in Australia, Clara came upon a dying sheep. The poor thing was prostrate on the hot, dry ground, writhing, panting, barely able to breathe. Clara's love of animals and training told her immediately that the animal should not be allowed to suffer. She ran to the nearest store in the small town to obtain the substance necessary to euthanize the suffering sheep. Just a teenager, she pulled coins out of her own purse and bought a vial of ether.
Once while in Australia, Clara came upon a dying sheep. The poor thing was prostrate on the hot, dry ground, writhing, panting, barely able to breathe. Clara's love of animals and training told her immediately that the animal should not be allowed to suffer. She ran to the nearest store in the small town to obtain the substance necessary to euthanize the suffering sheep. Just a teenager, she pulled coins out of her own purse and bought a vial of ether.
On the way back she ran
into the owner of the sheep, and explained her intentions. The owner
was amazed that he had overlooked such an emergency. With bold
conviction, Clara led the sheep owner to his animal and offered her
vial as the remedy. And that was when the shepherd broke out in
laughter. Clara meant well, but she would have killed a perfectly
healthy animal. She could have been prosecuted for killing a man's
livestock. She had wasted her money for a vial of deadly ether that
had no purpose, passionately inspired when she made some ignorant assumptions.
All of this happened or almost happened because she had decided to
usurp the authority of the shepherd.
The shepherd
good-naturedly showed her how the sheep had merely fallen down, and
was so overloaded with wool she couldn't stand back up, no matter how
much she wiggled. As soon as he lifted her to her feet, she
scampered off.
This was a life-lesson for
Clara Clemens and for all of us. Sometimes we do not know the
Shepherd, the BIG SHEPHERD, or we do and we still do not trust his
timing or judgment, and we make our own judgments based on what we
know or what we think we know. We might act totally out of a good
heart, noble intentions, but never the less we could kill the
innocent in the process, and become adversaries of the Shepherd as
well. Jesus taught that HE was the Shepherd, and we were like sheep
and needed a shepherd. When we fail to see a shepherd, and presume to
become THE shepherd, we are already trespassing and headed for
disaster. Just like Clara, just because we fail to see anyone around
in charge, does not mean that the Shepherd is not watching our every
step. We often act out of impatience, which easily becomes impudence,
as we act independently.
It is the delusion of the
strong that they do not need a shepherd. The richer and more powerful
you are, the more likely you are to become your own master, even your
own god.
Clara was not a shepherd.
She was actually a sheep in need of a shepherd. Her tiny bit of
knowledge led her to assume she had solutions to problems that did
not even exist. She read the whole situation wrongly and much like
her father, made herself the judge, jury and executioner. Thank
goodness she ran into the shepherd, who protected his sheep from the
well- intentioned but misguided young woman. He knew that all the
sheep needed was a lift, not a knock in the head. He was wise and
able to take care of his charge.
The shepherd does not need help from us. He only asks for our cooperation.
The shepherd does not need help from us. He only asks for our cooperation.
But assuming the role of a
mere sheep is not very glamorous. The rich and powerful despise this
kind of symbolism and the suggestion of weakness. They are quick to
make themselves the shepherd, whatever that may entail. That is often
the evil trail chosen by the right-brained vanguards of culture who
can easily imagine the steps to power and preeminence. Society would
do well to take note. The stubborn flame of creativity and ambition
and competition is a gift from God and yet the first element to
Lucifer's hell of self-worship and self-destruction. Here is a fork
in the road for every person, how they will choose to nurture and
utilize the flame.
One fork leads to becoming a light in the
darkness, used to glorify God in this spiritual battlefield. There is a
Shepherd to lead the way.
The other is a flickering flame that ultimately terminates in a dead-end trail and darkness. And you are completely on your own. And then the flame goes out.
The other is a flickering flame that ultimately terminates in a dead-end trail and darkness. And you are completely on your own. And then the flame goes out.
A gentle, good and loving
God has provided you with a choice. Obviously, he wants to have
fellowship with you forever, but He will not force it on you.
May our stubborn flames
burn brightly, and lead us to Truth and Perfection...
And may we meet someday in
Eternity with no more want or need of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for sticking your finger into the fire...please drop your thoughts into it!